Other Publication Details
Mandatory Fields
Reviews
Riordan, F;Ryan, K;Perry, IJ;Schulze, MB;Andersen, LF;Geelen, A;van't Veer, P;Eussen, S;Dagnelie, P;Wijckmans-Duysens, N;Harrington, JM
2017
February
A systematic review of methods to assess intake of fruits and vegetables among healthy European adults and children: a DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) study
Validated
1
Optional Fields
FOOD-FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRE FAMILY-INVOLVED INTERVENTION CORONARY-HEART-DISEASE CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS LIFE-STYLE BEHAVIORS PREVENT OBESITY RELATIVE VALIDITY EARLY CHILDHOOD. EATING HABITS PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN
Objective: Evidence suggests that health benefits are associated with consuming recommended amounts of fruits and vegetables (F&V), yet standardised assessment methods to measure F&V intake are lacking. The current review aims to identify methods to assess F&V intake among children and adults in pan-European studies and inform the development of the DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) toolbox of methods suitable for use in future European studies. Design: A literature search was conducted using three electronic databases and by hand-searching reference lists. English-language studies of any design which assessed F&V intake were included in the review. Setting: Studies involving two or more European countries were included in the review. Subjects: Healthy, free-living children or adults. Results: The review identified fifty-one pan-European studies which assessed F&V intake. The FFQ was the most commonly used (n 42), followed by 24 h recall (n 11) and diet records/diet history (n 7). Differences existed between the identified methods; for example, the number of F&V items on the FFQ and whether potatoes/legumes were classified as vegetables. In total, eight validated instruments were identified which assessed F&V intake among adults, adolescents or children. Conclusions: The current review indicates that an agreed classification of F&V is needed in order to standardise intake data more effectively between European countries. Validated methods used in pan-European populations encompassing a range of European regions were identified. These methods should be considered for use by future studies focused on evaluating intake of F&V.
CAMBRIDGE
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
1368-9800
417
448
10.1017/S1368980016002366
Grant Details