Other Publication Details
Mandatory Fields
Reviews
Sezgin, D;O'Donovan, M;Cornally, N;Liew, A;O'Caoimh, R
2019
April
Defining frailty for healthcare practice and research: A qualitative systematic review with thematic analysis
Validated
1
Optional Fields
OLDER-ADULTS COGNITIVE FRAILTY PHYSICAL FRAILTY NUTRITIONAL FRAILTY SOCIAL FRAILTY SARCOPENIA CONSENSUS DISABILITY INSTRUMENTS PHENOTYPE
Objective: To identify and examine definitions of frailty using qualitative thematic analysis. Design: A qualitative meta-aggregative systematic review. Data sources: The database search was performed using ASSIA, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Studies providing definitions of frailty, published in English from 1st January 2000 to 25th July 2018 were included. Review methods: Data were extracted by independent reviewers for qualitative thematic analysis. Results: In total, 86 studies met inclusion criteria. Five major themes with specific sub-themes were identified following thematic analysis including: (1) types of definitions (operational, conceptual, theoretical, older adults' perspective); (2) characteristics of frailty (a multi-domain and dimensional state, deficits/decline, weakness, a continuum-dynamic concept, clinically identifiable); (3) associated factors (age, comorbidity, nutrition, sarcopenia, social networks and environment); (4) mechanism (reduced adaptability, hormonal dysregulation); and (5) changes in health status and adverse outcomes (disability, increased risk of mortality, other healthcare related outcomes such as increased dependency or risk of falls). Conclusions: Several themes were found that defined frailty, focusing predominantly on operational definitions and frailty as a physical syndrome. A universally accepted standard definition, which includes all dimensions of frailty is currently warranted. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
OXFORD
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
0020-7489
16
26
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.12.014
Grant Details